tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995748411524319485.post3859643568090087599..comments2023-11-03T04:52:00.422-04:00Comments on False Hustle: Dishonesty, distraction and endless debateblackinkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00537923754597016040noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995748411524319485.post-65702609579226036902009-08-12T17:09:56.574-04:002009-08-12T17:09:56.574-04:00This is exactly why I cannot get into discussions ...This is exactly why I cannot get into discussions with some people about politics. I had no idea Obama was the reason GM failed. Wow. Live and learn. And was Katrina his fault too? D@mn - did Obama shoot the sheriff too? You know all this time people have been saying OJ did it...but now, I dunno. lol. Seems like everything is "blame it on Obama".<br /><br />I cannot tell you how tired I am of jokers like this who try to defend GW's bullish presidency with bullish facts. That's exactly why we are in the shitzers now....<br /><br />If McCain had won the election - would he feel the same heated lashes if he didn't repair Bush's crap in 100 days? I think not. I don't understand how these people try to act all surprised that it takes time (longer than 8 months) to correct 8 years of disaster.<br /><br />Get that mess outta here blackink - oh I'm hot now! I am so glad I wasn't online to chat with this dude. I would have been calling for him to get right down to the 'real' issue and it has nothing to do with politics.Bougie Applebumhttp://www.bougieapplebum.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995748411524319485.post-74115814283135712952009-08-09T15:06:46.022-04:002009-08-09T15:06:46.022-04:00Absolutely. The intellectual dishonesty - or stupi...Absolutely. The intellectual dishonesty - or stupidity? - is really brazen there.<br /><br />I mean, how do you even bother to argue the point about GM there? Is it even worth it?<br /><br />And I'm always skeptical of using poll numbers - 100, then 200 days in - to prove much of anything. The only thing we need to know is that Obama won the election with roughly 53 percent of the vote and the relative success or failure of his policies.<br /><br />There's concrete proof that Bush was an abject failure. I didn't need a poll to them me that, you know?blackinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00537923754597016040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995748411524319485.post-54673744826461042392009-08-08T11:21:58.326-04:002009-08-08T11:21:58.326-04:00It's not that these cats are conservative that...It's not that these cats are conservative that's the problem; it's that they don't know what they're talking about. They haven't pointed to one policy related disagreement they have with dude.<br /><br /> Bush is easily one of the two or three worst presidents in the history of the Republic, and they've basically said that nothing that happened during his presidency was his fault. Nothing. And then they bring up Obama's poll numbers, but never mention that Bush's numbers hadn't been as high as Obama's current trough for the last FIVE YEARS of his presidency.<br /><br />G.M. has been failing for decades, and its bankruptcy is suddenly Obama's fault. Amazing.G.D.http://www.postbourgie.comnoreply@blogger.com